From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:00:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <831txw944g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395338468 1682 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2014 18:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 20 19:01:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WQhHF-0008Hh-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:01:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48571 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQhHF-0007oW-Fa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQhH6-0007cK-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQhGz-0000We-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:54130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQhGq-0000VU-3G; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:00:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA44YlmKBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA44YlmKBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="52782730" Original-Received: from 206-248-162-160.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.162.160]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Mar 2014 14:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 47AB56012B; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <831txw944g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:22:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170642 Archived-At: >> > And of course, the frame's "garbaged" bit may not always be needed: if >> > the frame was simply iconified+deiconified without any other change, >> > there's no need to recompute matrices nor redraw anything, since it's >> > pretty much the same as obscuring the frame with another and then >> > exposing it again. >> I suggest the patch below for w32term.c. Guaranteed 100% untested, of >> course, > Thanks. What bug does this fix? Nothing, IIUC. It just "tightens" the code to try and clarify when "garbaged" needs to be set. Stefan