From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rant - Emacs mail is not user friendly Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871tp4wut1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87mw7qvign.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bno5ulbu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416586086 19337 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 16:08:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , kelly@prtime.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 17:07:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrqkX-0002a1-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:07:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrqkX-0001BS-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrqkM-00015u-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrqkF-0001qR-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:46 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:54287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrqk7-0001p5-7L; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sALG7UVB002969; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E21D843B8; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:07:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:51:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5132=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5132> : inlines <1553> : streams <1346279> : uri <1835574> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177952 Archived-At: > I have recruited someone to make a JPG-validator that will > thoroughly check for anything incorrect in a JPG file. That's nice, but some security bugs strike even when faced with a correct/valid JPG file. What we need to validate is the libjpeg code, not the JPG files. Stefan