From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `pop-up-frames' and binding/setting user options [was: Documenting buffer display] Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:35:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5BCD9331.6020203@gmx.at> <3c7bc9d6-2841-4f67-96ef-511af5237475@default> <5BCE21BD.80008@gmx.at> <0f035e05-e04e-459c-b9a3-df1eb5542e65@default> <5BCEE2C8.50008@gmx.at> <66b0ff55-af0d-42c0-80b1-87585e4c557f@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540316008 11676 195.159.176.226 (23 Oct 2018 17:33:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:33:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 23 19:33:24 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0YW-0002tz-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:33:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0ac-0006PE-NH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:35:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0aR-0006Mx-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0aM-00012J-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36297 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0aM-00011H-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gF0YC-0002VI-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:33:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:x9rJ6bNYH+Rn+ZN3ANghVR5tVkc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230597 Archived-At: > Sure, we both acknowledged that. But why would you > choose to use an `other-frame' command for those > specific bookmarks for which it is not TRT? That's > the question. Because the user doesn't want to have to think about it. So he always uses the same key-binding and then configures display-buffer-alist to adjust the behavior for those corner cases where another frame is not the right destination. Stefan