From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:07:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4c5631d4-9dfd-04c6-c573-b83c67fcc2fa@yandex.ru> <87pni7p83l.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/x-markdown; charset=UTF-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="138426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel , Dmitry Gutov To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 05 20:08:46 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iS4C5-000Zmc-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:08:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iS4C4-0002ne-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iS4BR-0002nU-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:08:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iS4BP-0001rv-Ty for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iS4BP-0001rU-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7D5C74498BF; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:08:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 398464498A2; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:08:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1572980881; bh=tO81UHDoSOxiwDr/iY524z2lIUOt/T1z2FztlMDf5jI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=idHH5pdc3ieguAHLPB21sva2Sy8SFKPdX/fWkMn9khxmv61eBfffQ0Fo3Xdcw+aeH 9KAblpLDDCoCaK9vfh0dvQcC1jP3gBhgtkd45QzvgnEj9ZYapPMRoXDecoqgeV4i0W ej43ur8FDTLHHoe40Tbn0D+DVCNaPAMQWHrxEzVovBgzOiFtJ/k/qPD0NmisIGMqJh c4ckBC6FMH4Be3fX5lw6RTE3VOGyBMH2aJR3nbj/eXrJS7HAaN3Ou5/TlvI5iFJPSg OPxRVMJ5Ztbkm5LhmIIYlmptGfdyeAS4Fq1rJgJfsgptEt42wu5EZhNfASgCNQZ+R/ jgrUDa8kzUnWQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.47.134]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E600A1204E8; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:08:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:54:50 +0000") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241814 Archived-At: > Just nullify the firstdiff face and it becomes better! And you still > "see" the first diff via very advanced visual differentiation > techniques available today in most mammal's brains. I don't think this has much of a chance of getting wide approval. >> I'm no big fan of "common=blue3-background firstdiff=bold" but it might ^^^^ fore Duh! Sorry! > Company uses the same face for flex and common, a drab red > that is barely visible against the default yellow. It's a different colorscheme, but it's comparable to the "blue3-foreground" in terms of visibility/discretion (maybe the red-on-yellow is a bit more visible). > Textmate used to use bold. I bet Sublime text and other still use > it, but probably I'll lose that bet. I don't have any such editors around for testing, so if anybody else has datapoints to contribute, that would be helpful. Stefan