From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about ibuffer Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:58:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> <20191110031743.uy653armkqcawkkg@Ergus> <83woc27q93.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="126790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 14:59:30 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFek-000Wtr-41 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:59:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57894 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFei-00011C-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFeP-0000tT-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFeO-0004ZU-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFeJ-0004YS-Ug; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:04 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F4E01004A7; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C4A16100427; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:00 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573739940; bh=39JyTF2KOF85DvnwaPyA3MbZ6Hl4UM0B70x+UAqZHZI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dcxKuof0c3Fv70RtBn9OfIYRb3hqp6NoHoaaacCPFK7Qnl3lpXaSva6FVXJ/0TcvU xi7FXgf4cQxR4IWEb9PEYwXDNEBz+Erilkm7d0KMtHk852iCd5ytP0KAK4jYdTsszR snO1oYiS5RCFSMcL4p6c3rwZafR1m2hE3ySa6j5riKmCne2gfGKQE0sreT8yTk/aPT z6CQ07XtkaKtKFTGfK9WAH0gYPAJEh1QitH4SzBoXdSaBH5SzkvF4YQjKEn1zfSBCZ GGe8Xk9qq+40hcRMqw7ks/gsGZTdQ0M2VlA/KIgbwa+JOvdwjL5BnDaDAs6vQKONyW fPm9dWOhXRU+Q== Original-Received: from pastel (206-248-133-142.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.133.142]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B6AC1209C1; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:59:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83woc27q93.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:37:28 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242158 Archived-At: > I have C-x C-b rebound to a different command long ago (not to > ibuffer), and I don't really understand why we need to talk about > defaults that are so easy to change as the user sees fit. That's why I'd like to merge ibuffer and list-buffers: so we get extended functionality without the user having to choose. > If we do change the default in this case, we will need to adapt the > related documentation, including the tutorial and the user manual. A merge also won't require adapting the manual: only completing it with the new functionality. Stefan