From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs project mission (was Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [ Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191118175639.08d02820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874kz0pa9y.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgmjyn60.fsf@gmx.de> <875zjelte0.fsf@gnus.org> <871ru2zubp.fsf@gmx.de> <87lfsakdxp.fsf@gnus.org> <87wobuydwz.fsf@gmx.de> <87r222ix8i.fsf@gnus.org> <87tv6yveix.fsf@gmx.de> <871ru15tnx.fsf@gnus.org> <7ecb0429-a81a-ae76-77de-bdd00e3b292b@yandex.ru> <871ru1xnvs.fsf@gnus.org> <87tv6xw91o.fsf@gnus.org> <83imndxn7v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="95272"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, dgutov@yandex.ru, Lars Ingebrigtsen , perry@piermont.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 16:52:51 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXolG-000OeZ-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:52:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXolF-0001oU-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXol9-0001oA-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXol7-0000oQ-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:7100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXol6-0000mS-DS; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 361AA810B1; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C0719806B3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1574351557; bh=YOPUMSt4xeyIMCDHh8DHshBATY1zYNgChnDh+weUXE4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PVRNVD6SIhY9JHPrRZGt8W7FbOv9j/wjoJWd9c32RxXLLOSoFpfRtA/8wUtxw8A1M LHIRtqR0geHG11Lm+iVw5E93UDvj5V+8XFya54DXBy5LRnipcWjD8o5CaGKsnkqwcm li0Ci1NvlYRKk7Zc83oylPPsQpHquUQta63he4Kzh3StftZ+wCqpFHosmyKHtsNWgJ JsKk1f5WSiW9LBXd2ynLiTJ+Ibnoen0tQ6ZyHITcgHaeDOdn+X8NUH3sJOaSJs8hZC 1n5ehGUOQZxqBNMGq7QLBpfINNz9atQwaZq+19iP7LnGfXD4WaRQWBgC9lWZIDW4nw SzZ6AQa8jmKqA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.18.30]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BEF7120484; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:52:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83imndxn7v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:28:52 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242579 Archived-At: > Once again, I think we need to talk to GitLab developers about this. > It makes no sense not to have a solution for this issue. Maybe there > already is one, just not widely known or documented. I think the only thing we need is to be able to subscribe arbitrary email addresses to an issue (instead of being limited to subscribing users known to Gitlab). I think it's a valuable functionality in any case. Stefan