From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:16:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> <5ba98104-7154-972a-743a-9865e10ae3dd@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="100991"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 06 04:17:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHKQ-000Q9V-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 04:17:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHKP-00046x-DW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHJv-0003iY-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHJu-00018U-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:7360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLHJs-00015Y-GV; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:17:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5446880D52; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 22:16:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A112D80B6E; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 22:16:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1586139417; bh=j6YyOuIHGx/HMjUTALGFt7dZS7gJTbR/tuNU2vJ43Vk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nkR7h99InqXARUWHw7CD927PA4DVCzfGb0jJBPjU7YiMZTmzcyXYxlQtKWnRs6EBV HWxMXsGw+8bk5FbaYTO7s+c/VExcAKHTOGYK+EKdP7+X/DFx0LtZ7BQjI5sMbunBUZ hjqPNlW/GW4DPQuTWT49DbnQlHkwnhASeHYJMHS5KqUrSSwYzdAYlUpNFVmK6gSe0y x6rV3A6UFHuhEpcnooNIBId1VyucU7tlvm7Vz1EbL6aq/a3teVRqyGnY0hPKSY5zfw ATt9wYVcSIViYKQ/WPGjUYQJ+c5XQynoe3hur/uljvr7+k1FNsHXSZy6nLwp7Wrrxq 2JYMPrw05VBDQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14692120783; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 22:16:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5ba98104-7154-972a-743a-9865e10ae3dd@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 5 Apr 2020 22:21:57 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246499 Archived-At: >>> And in this case, IIUC, jit-lock is part of redisplay. >> Yes, it often is when scrolling. > So would you agree that short-circuiting and skipping jit-lock while > somebody leans on C-v is a good idea? It sounds like a trick question, because what I just described says that it is what already happens, more or less, and I'm not sure which part of the difference you're thinking of. Stefan