From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master baf331e 3/3: Rename replace-in-string to string-replace Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200926222500.20662.9159@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200926222503.227F720441@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87h7riw3ti.fsf@gnus.org> <9e0ee248-a276-4f6a-a29f-a8984a0cf6fa@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26742"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 28 19:33:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMx1V-0006qX-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:33:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMx1U-0007wR-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMwqU-0004Do-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:33268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMwqQ-000704-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:49 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2FFD100271; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC591100227; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1601313703; bh=adSRhy3CBl6bcsRaAfqG1ilPcHz3JMEKaMogc9X5jIw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jdz+xiZ8x7ClWctyY4tCnQrN8qLsrIDirXWXRgsolnsnVums8DxmXge9FznIirc2g nt1Q46+y4VuNBpWIy4Cz16D2prxAVRlOTx8p6KJ/mPLHv6t1/2sk30kqXave/OAMkO +c2OWnP7+cBNDObi7ymcb9mzHTH6HgcNw9+hSSG876mSWboSy/BFUS7TNjCQkZ2IaD EY/p5+/pnA6iYfYFlRhvYRQcKQ7u0m3A3qhuB2kGShVWql7dDeWH88ojYva9wK9IBB Cy3ONunwk7mGf9SccZ2ZhkG0hoprvgiLN2vTTjZ4KfauZfaEQ1RD6Nqz1uOEZa7rW/ RYowSjX7pKYjg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 318E41202F4; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9e0ee248-a276-4f6a-a29f-a8984a0cf6fa@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:21:03 -0700 (PDT)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/28 12:57:02 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256625 Archived-At: > Now we'll have `replace-string' and `string-replace'? I don't care much which name we use, but I mist admit that I'm always annoyed by `string-match` vs `match-string` so I'd be happy if we avoided this snag for `replace-string' vs `string-replace'? Stefan