From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Represent NTP's origin time Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39701"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 15:57:58 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VJ-000ADj-V7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:57:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41076 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2VJ-0003vI-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2IQ-00059z-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:61178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lX2IO-00018E-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7B5B3100216; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1C831000F4; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1618494273; bh=9IU2xzAQ36bf6y8/sXNj/n6sJzFqA6BWOm41edRG6kk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TlJ2ms8OFKEssrmO1y81gCJkol4GkL986l9ftAbuC3dCFLdYPeaN7Wuo0MoYyPYzf 0lX5ICHCWmS8UWvHzoZ5I65yQrgecc6t+uQ3l06zACMX61gcMcOl5+a5WDR1RnwAek PEvkAsvvqh1RtH3/enLxIEiYdiyxSg3kxoha+mpWYdqBwmp7Jo9bNu3tWNz00Fqaso diUZgf5jjc8iTUwVm6gZDOBHs03zm41CSgPLmJ1/1PbMuNCDXiR+c+G+Axy0EZPrgc ee7dDEG50EySXLjAhTPe2NdVjrg0K6pixVnPQBVEdE8Ue5KDkELCISYj1q37Dmcy8b 7IDf0PHx5hNSA== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D3B12014C; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:44:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:41:18 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268094 Archived-At: > It should be 64 bit time_t since Linux 5.6: > https://linux.slashdot.org/story/20/02/15/0247201/linux-is-ready-for-the-end-of-time FWIW, the original report was sent from a machine running a 5.10 kernel. I strongly suspect that the libc part is crucial as well. In any case, my question is not about which systems support it and how common/rare they are or will be but just how to deal with the situation. Stefan