From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: printing.el again Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:51:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <419779C4.50909@ig.com.br> <871xew44v1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <41990B75.1080603@ig.com.br> <41994FFB.2060308@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100624305 13544 80.91.229.6 (16 Nov 2004 16:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 16 17:58:15 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CU6el-0007K9-00 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:58:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU6nW-0001mL-Kd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CU6he-0007WJ-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CU6hd-0007Vj-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU6hc-0007VT-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CU6Yn-0000mw-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1B28282C6; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:52:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643374AC068; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:51:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 507868CA69; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:51:47 -0500 (EST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Ralf Angeli's message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:47:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29934 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29934 >> Actually, I don't think optimizations should be particularly mentioned. >> The interesting part of optimizing (featurep 'xemacs) is that it eliminates >> spurious warnings. There are other ways to get the same effect, such as >> what is done with (if (fboundp 'foo) ...) where the test is not optimized >> away, but where warnings are selectively prevented. > Is it planned to recognize (and (fboundp 'foo) ...) and (and (boundp > 'foo) ...) as well? As soon as someone writes the patch for it. Stefan