From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:17:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20041208064957.GF14847@boetes.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102513322 17616 80.91.229.6 (8 Dec 2004 13:42:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 14:41:58 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cc1jG-0005Sc-00 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:19:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc1t7-0004Vl-Az for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc1rg-0004UG-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:28:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc1rd-0004Sr-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:28:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cc1rd-0004Si-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cc1hN-0005AC-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:17:41 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED2F8282AD; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:17:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F114AC660; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:17:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BBDD58CA69; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:17:34 -0500 (EST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041208064957.GF14847@boetes.org> (Han Boetes's message of "Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:49:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.173, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.73, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30861 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30861 > It would be nice if the undo history would recognize that: > "any char" > followed by > m-x delete-backward-char > Is functionally the same as. > "any char" > followed by > m-x undo > I admit it's easier said than done. What would be the benefit? I.e. in which cases would it make a diference? Stefan