From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stealth fontification GCs a lot Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:52:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <01c53ee5$Blat.v2.4$0af9c0a0@zahav.net.il> <01c53f91$Blat.v2.4$46f81b40@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113335964 11531 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 19:59:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 21:59:20 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLRWe-0004Ct-2B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:58:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLR6u-0002wu-DI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLR5o-0002bP-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLR5T-0002TY-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLR5T-0002RT-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLRRj-00041l-M5; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69BF340008; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DB62CC048; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 05511E6C16; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:52:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <01c53f91$Blat.v2.4$46f81b40@zahav.net.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:55:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.833, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.07, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35910 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35910 > Since Stefan says the default settings annoy him, I'd like Stefan to > try mine, compare to what he sees with the defaults, and report CPU > usage for both cases. If he says the effect is good, that could > indeed be a reason for changing the defaults. The problem is that I've never noticed any positive effect of stealth fontification, whereas any setting, no matter how low will eat up my battery for no good reason. Stefan