From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to control isearch for invisible text Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <854pwh3y55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85d5b3yenv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85d5b3tshe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155560375 902 80.91.229.2 (14 Aug 2006 12:59:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 14:59:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCc2L-0007Nd-Ko for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:59:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCc2L-0004MA-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCc29-0004Lv-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCc27-0004Lf-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCc27-0004LX-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.25] (helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GCc7t-00008G-OB; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.146.213]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060814125904.NCHL18394.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4B915826A; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85d5b3tshe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:24:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58379 Archived-At: > This is pretty useless, since in your kind of application, it would be > important to know window-point rather than point. The documentation > of window-point already states: So it's called multiple times on the same buffer for each window that displays the buffer. And you pass the window as argument (so you rename it to pre-redisplay-functions). Big deal. Next "problem"? > And that is precisely the same problem with reveal-mode: sit-for can > be called inside of save-excursions, and the current window-point need > not correspond with the point relevant at top-level. What matters is what is displayed. Which is why a pre-redisplay-hoook is what is needed. Stefan