From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87od9wt19m.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ablffdf7.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4s4pbm9lrb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87skz4n6lu.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87r6enpy30.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204827207 15087 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 18:13:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , rms@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kfogel@red-bean.com, paul.r.ml@gmail.com To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 19:13:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXKax-0005sy-Cl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:13:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXKaP-000195-Ao for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXKaL-00017l-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXKaJ-00017X-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXKaJ-00017U-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXKa8-0006Qn-F5; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:40 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAILCz0fO+LKX/2dsb2JhbACsXIEH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,457,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15666286" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2008 13:12:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.178.151]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id MVS13739; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:12:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C1DF7816B; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:12:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r6enpy30.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:21:55 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91531 Archived-At: >> As far as I can tell it's fully functional. W.r.t the performance, it >> seems acceptable and I'd expect it to be comparable to the performance >> of Arch in similar circumstances. > Arch is way too slow in general... Agreed. Hopefully bzr-over-sftp is only as slow as Arch w.r.t the actual network access, and all the subsequent operations are a good bit faster. Stefan