From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and the Status Notification Specification Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:16:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wrgcz9ks.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762nrcl8k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcvqp3zv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4c3xzmm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjqq93ie.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oc1ei1rk.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309530897 11672 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 14:34:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:34:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 16:34:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qceo0-0007P2-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:34:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34195 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcenz-0002Aa-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QceWH-0005vX-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:16:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QceWG-0008OK-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:27086 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QceWF-0008Jw-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:16:31 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUIAJ3VDU5MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABSmHCOcniIeb9hhjIEnlOELA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,458,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="118299654" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Jul 2011 10:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4C67A5912D; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:16:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87oc1ei1rk.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 01 Jul 2011 08:11:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141372 Archived-At: > I like Chong's approach of asking Tom Tromey to change his archive's name. If Tom is OK with it, that's even better, but being the originator of the feature and name, he has every right to keep the name as is. I'd hope he'd keep "ELPA" in any new name he might adopt. > "GNU ELPA" is a really nice, logical, memorable name. There's been no > confusion when I've used it. That's also my experience, which is why I don't think there's any need to change it. Stefan