From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: smtp crap Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8739f4kzp3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ipo0p1bc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <58C87CB9F44943A7BBE78F2D6B62A850@us.oracle.com> <83botsf06d.fsf@gnu.org> <83k48cxj85.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwizxwy1.fsf@gnu.org> <838vorxrbd.fsf@gnu.org> <8739ezjhen.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318381964 29210 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2011 01:12:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:12:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 03:12:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDnN7-0006Fa-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:12:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35889 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDnN6-0001N1-Lu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDnN3-0001Mq-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDnN2-00028P-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:36208 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDnN2-00028J-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:32 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIIADPolE5FxJoX/2dsb2JhbABDmU2OYIEGgVMBAQQBVigLCzQSFBgNEAGIJLg0h0wEoR6ERQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,526,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="141313369" Original-Received: from 69-196-154-23.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.154.23]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Oct 2011 21:12:32 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C1F205933F; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:12:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8739ezjhen.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:24:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144939 Archived-At: > + (insert "Emacs has not been set up for sending mail.\n > +It can be told to send mail either via your favorite mail client, > +or via the system's mail transport agent (\"sendmail\"), if any, > +or it can send email on its own by configuring the SMTP parameters.\n > Should the "sendmail" option be off the table if the system doesn't have > a sendmail executable? (I.e., Windows and OS X.) I kept it in the text (qualified with "if any"), although it is removed from the possible completions. I felt it is worthwhile to mention that such an option exists, even if it's not currently available. Stefan