From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5csu7ml.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365451676 7731 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2013 20:07:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 20:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 08 22:08:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPIMC-0008S1-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:08:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPIMB-0000IK-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPIM8-0000Hw-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPIM7-0007Za-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:15661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPIM7-0007ZQ-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:55 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJCuHcwbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJCuHcwbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="6932715" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.174]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Apr 2013 16:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2230862EFE; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:07:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5csu7ml.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:47:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158780 Archived-At: >>> 1. File structuring with outcommented Org-mode headlines (;; * Headline) >> There is already a standard for that: >> ;;; Headline >> ;;;; SubHeadline >> ;;;;; SubSubHeadline >> outline-minor-mode understands it. > ok, lets put it like this: I wanted to let fellow Emacs/Org-mode users > know that they can have the same thing in Org-mode style now. I was responding to: > Would it make sense to define 'modern conventions for Emacs Lisp files' > based on all this new functionality and the popularity of Org-mode? Your message wasn't quite clear on what those "modern" conventions would look like. I'd be happy to refine/extend/tweak the existing conventions, but switching to different ones would be a lot more problematic. Stefan