From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA branch, master, updated. 7ff5dc6402198c358bfbbfe5b620f23c459bca14 Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:18:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a9jqrhnj.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378430305 4973 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2013 01:18:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 01:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 06 03:18:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHkgs-00053Z-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 03:18:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34605 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHkgr-0006hF-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHkgi-0006g5-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHkgb-0007FJ-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:50114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHkgb-0007Et-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:18:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KK6/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtjQ+DewOkeoFegxOBUw X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KK6/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtjQ+DewOkeoFegxOBUw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="26608523" Original-Received: from 206-248-162-186.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.162.186]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Sep 2013 21:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 446D266A60; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:18:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87a9jqrhnj.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:25:29 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163206 Archived-At: > I haven't received this notification over email, and I think I should > have (it's for the latest change in company-capf). Yes, you should have. I'll take a look at my script to see what happened. > Should I maybe add a Maintainer header to company-capf.el, too? No, the dispatch is based on the package name only, not the individual files. Stefan