From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eshell and lexical bindings Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:40:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87habxqx41.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87r4b0ctgu.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87habwb8jc.fsf@nbtrap.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383327632 32758 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 17:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nathan Trapuzzano Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 18:40:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcIi1-0001Td-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:40:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcIi1-0003Tr-E5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcIhn-0003Te-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcIhg-0007G0-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:58827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcIhg-0007Fw-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rA1HeBMQ005266; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4BB36B420C; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:40:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87habwb8jc.fsf@nbtrap.com> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:39:35 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4749=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4749> : inlines <196> : streams <1066250> : uri <1582815> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164816 Archived-At: >> I'm not a native speaker, and have never really learned the exact >> meaning, but my understanding of it is a mix of "all the way", >> "bluntly", and "without looking back". > Will no one notice because no one uses it? No: because the code that a user is likely to type there will behave the same regardless of `lexical-binding'. Stefan