From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ERC versioning Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:23:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87vbplof9c.wl%kwhite@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408652663 22071 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2014 20:24:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kelvin White Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 21 22:24:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYu1-0001SR-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:24:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYu0-0005Mt-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYtp-00052Q-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYth-00059i-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:57019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYth-00058k-JL; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:23:49 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVPAqyKr/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqwODTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVPAqyKr/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiAQI0hkXjnoHhDgEqwODTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="87406632" Original-Received: from 192-171-34-171.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([192.171.34.171]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Aug 2014 16:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4763062D5A; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:23:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87vbplof9c.wl%kwhite@gnu.org> (Kelvin White's message of "Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173790 Archived-At: > Is there any reason not to drop ERC version now that > it isn't maintained seperately from Emacs? So, instead of ... > "ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)" > it would be "ERC (IRC client for Emacs 24.4)" etc. > Otherwise it will always be version 5.3 but part of Emacs release > cycle. Any thoughts? Fine by me, Stefan