From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: why do some programming modes have customize hooks and others do not? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bnp9eir3.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <2128728.y75FreRA9t@descartes> <871tq36tpl.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87y4sb57uk.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413823660 19054 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2014 16:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nic Ferrier , emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 20 18:47:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgG7H-0004FA-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:47:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgG7H-0005Hq-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgG77-0005Gp-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgG6z-0004da-Tf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:27721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgG6z-0004d2-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:13 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArkGAIDvNVNFpY87/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsAzAQEIgRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kLodWCNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArkGAIDvNVNFpY87/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsAzAQEIgRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kLodWCNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="94652497" Original-Received: from 69-165-143-59.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.143.59]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Oct 2014 12:47:12 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8B22D3EBC; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:47:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:07:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175596 Archived-At: > Another possible solution to this conundrum would be for the customize > interface itself to provide special treatment on hook variables. Indeed. Stefan