From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> <83k32r89rd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tx1t6dv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4r53reb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416582170 25672 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 15:02:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 16:02:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrpjP-0006YR-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:02:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrpjO-0006bK-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrpj3-0006a8-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrpis-0001UA-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrpis-0001U3-Cm; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:10 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sALF29ZI023849; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E8D5E43B8; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:02:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83y4r53reb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:10:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5132=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5132> : inlines <1552> : streams <1346254> : uri <1835568> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177947 Archived-At: > But you were suggesting that as a general principle, not as solution > to that particular problem alone? No, I was thinking about a solution to Lars's situation. > As for Lars's situation, there is a much simpler solution to that, > which I already pointed out earlier in this thread. It is also much > cleaner, IMO. I must have missed it. Stefan