From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <875zalolt7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87v9ikmmly.fsf@bernoul.li> <87imeal72x.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ft9el2bl.fsf@bernoul.li> <83a6zmgl0p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33596"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 26 21:47:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jzmc6-0008Zy-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 21:47:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzmc5-0004BQ-Ee for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzmag-0003Rw-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:25256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzmae-0000Om-Fa; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 70ADD80541; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0006680836; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1595792741; bh=snvE0eHNy49GsviBdv+9LH7m27pCc6HxJuJQ+VB7C+Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=UqF9TGdb/R3cBWOx/ScKcq1yW6DxQ0zj/LDnyTdEodt0/5N6mDQbLMFw4O8R7xC5l eEc03QzJ/QvCH8DlVAZsFbJVL/WUXPZCWHifv3drBE4huzqJYdu+rAV2Pd/B6ZaXYh hebh8X6VIH+81n6qab0Sl7lRSBmxTmrIgQeAbOuYiMWAkW+WhwpLDzGERugdYw4Kch UyjhmUqiNLm8mzhHHIAQdVJn0dIS6ncRNOhTLkfjTlCB/YJnroVv0ioZQrPJQpEUJ0 LGJMxDfz0u/SU2QMCWE0GWIWCVxAmQHsUPcEA/cIOHoIzbbFv11IscLRTHq2NSVXpQ +/224A4baNFPg== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [104.247.229.155]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C28491207B8; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:45:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83a6zmgl0p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2020 21:59:34 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/26 14:23:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253272 Archived-At: > But after the proposed changes, almost none of the code will be under > "Code:", so the name will be a misnomer, no? Could be. But that's a very minor cosmetic problem, AFAIC, and none of the suggested replacements for it sound particularly useful/enlightening either. Which is why I wrote that "renaming it would provide very little concrete benefits". The costs/downsides of a rename are much more immediately apparent OTOH. Stefan