From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 42596bd 2/6: Little improvements in rmail.el. Recognize encryped override headers. Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210512030946.27770.7288@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210512030948.6448F21128@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87a6p0kuxi.fsf@gnus.org> <8335us3xkh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24894"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 17:17:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgqc2-0006CZ-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 17:17:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgqc0-000251-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgqZf-0000Zy-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:15:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:62405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgqZY-0006qP-PS; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6BD791001FC; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DA32510008C; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1620832488; bh=FPQAZpr28xrwaTBCdMj92GYPuxqjOVy4vVC/bVuxivQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=cxKEYOTysYZTV6e7XJeqMuAqcmg6WWPImYfMmc7XMIdm+JEICXQZBfr3QQ56fCSuX u+8C5at2c6sXhrY3XqvQgjhKS+rh8rYy3nN82KcBmZrUEOXD/HSj4PIrqYUIEn7GHC IvKuK0kr3Jacp95o2P9hPlwx+UK1n8vTrhNKYH7zP/KzvV2o7vKubzW47nKrdp5Aba z6pBhTidHiD8S+Xq5FRiU9X0xa1WiH4aCYoAXKwbUjZ7gelpskFbM83SgdE9irMlpB x7cBfKXsYYIFX6VXlmZP6Ku4Ab/XkMwNyHspT6tO3PhOZsNUgAtCrpXGzDVczKTu3X mwqNpYEmcaZ3Q== Original-Received: from alfajor (76-10-140-76.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.140.76]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC061204DB; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:14:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8335us3xkh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 12 May 2021 16:12:46 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_DOTEDU=1.271 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269209 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii [2021-05-12 16:12:46] wrote: > Drew might be a single person, but he tends to flood the Emacs mailing > lists with a lot of messages carrying this addition. Rmail's > threading is based on comparing their Subject lines, and Rmail already > has quite a few heuristics whose purpose is to clean up the Subject > line to that end. I see nothing wrong with adding one more > heuristics; the problem hits me as well. But this shouldn't be embedded directly into the code. We should have instead a variable specifying those cases (so it can be extended/adjusted depending on the cases the users face). Gregory Heytings [2021-05-12 14:17:59] wrote: > See https://its.uiowa.edu/support/article/114496 for a possible explanation. > This is typically something big corporations or government agencies do; for > another example on this mailing list, see the posts from Stephan Mueller > (microsoft.com), which use [EXTERNAL]. I suspect that similar things happen in non-anglophone contexts where the word used is likely different. Stefan