From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master b72f885: Make dlet work like let, not let* Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:50:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83wnp5m9i5.fsf@gnu.org> <9DE2F5D1-A89A-4357-9E46-268F697D8260@acm.org> <837dh2mz57.fsf@gnu.org> <74C5058D-AF5C-4F1A-8D08-251935A69693@acm.org> <831r7amsef.fsf@gnu.org> <83y29il8nx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12714"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 03 20:51:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mAzVw-00031s-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:51:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAzVu-0003wr-L9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:51:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAzUZ-0001NZ-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:65391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mAzUV-0002zq-Iy; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 14:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72AA480928; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:50:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3D4E78025F; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:50:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1628016611; bh=ltAo9DBnE86t8/amWu5iP/f1sFQ1YgOYfU+kW69mx+Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IF5U66O+AB6nZ5i42o4UcpK10Fb/D9hAigpPeB4xqIYc+Q1tJ1KDOP2gpsjaizT4g HGZj0JVqnFnMsatUm7+eyY1apSFS3Gzd6oYFGBNaCYUbD73/vH8KkD8TN8stg5pavF QBVfroHM8sov1g7eTLmiZwp6yYDG8DV8CiBUdJeg75wEPS0idyAJHnGSE810rjtZrt YEtgtCMt9tYFjR0JRTvuJHGbksYhZBqc6gJaxGz0xaTy4abbk+W7NZEE1hODm10Sp/ yPw0X8dxGs0CnCPLsT9yVRzjogQdeFh0rGGcR+6Z7aSNBTsZSiGhVScdYLeDagfeHp sZwU4mj9Vf6XQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 086DF1201C1; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 14:50:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83y29il8nx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:50:26 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271990 Archived-At: >> Because the * is unsightly ;-) > So what are your suggestions regarding this issue? > Leave it as it is now, go back to what we had before, something else? I'm OK with leaving it the was it is now. Stefan