From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calling another major mode in a major mode body Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:46:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1263D369-330F-4624-A376-ECC1E1A26A52@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33990"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Phil Sainty , emacs-devel To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 03:47:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxfnf-0008ea-Ia for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 03:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxfmz-0003i2-7M; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxfmx-0003ht-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxfmw-0004ZJ-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF9201000F8; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:46:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 561731000E7; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:46:58 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1669171618; bh=ExbIRg0ZZlaGnPt/XnbC86KSbl/eqfALzyAtSOa2dmQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bxaAoyp3EqcvpP2R8W8kPeZN69dOB581WoJy60/LFiRjAWxkMowBAz+fp6nzf+7jQ vTMYSsmdpm5TEOOgN/+VJ+cmXkdweVL1tsteCR6/C+A4+WJvPLMCz78cy/H82/AFYm 8ojpMZBC/DWTmT9UxraT/CXYKOWd7hT/m8TsM9Bzy2IwjhAEgU9e2XT672D1x0i/bH 3uGdXplilVE7Unm6J8HxwXEgcIvNUboPfiQN9hczyLCNaw9DYTh9S43nw6VSIi+cAW 7F4udH6p+UPMrZzBxAV+lvUiROVM5kCyA6spc1H+BXE86q3Z6JU2aUbKitS3g1//a5 0/rf9oEMIMmKg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.157]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2444D12041F; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:46:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Yuan Fu's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:03:43 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300375 Archived-At: > Thanks for that detailed explanation :-) > > It seems the current mode=E2=80=99s after-hook is ran the very last. So i= t might be > a good place to call the fallback major mode. The call to run-hooks in > a major mode invocation command is outside the scope delay-mode-hooks, so > simply calling the fallback major mode should be fine? I think even cleaner is if the dispatch can happen before we even call `kill-all-local-variables`. That's what `tex-mode` does (tho it gets there in a roundabout way because I didn't want to change `define-derived-mode`). Stefan