From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET version Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87txqgjfmx.fsf@mail36.net> <9c38xzv0q7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <76ehhjw8bb.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqv62vu1.fsf@engster.org> <0ca9s2ht87.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FE1044.1010307@siege-engine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358881833 10305 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2013 19:10:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eric M. Ludlam" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 22 20:10:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjFD-0001Dq-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:10:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjEt-0000qu-Cd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjEp-0000qY-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjEe-0002G7-Tz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjEe-0002Fr-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxjEb-0003ng-I9; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:13 -0500 X-Spook: BATF Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Nazi USCODE $400 million in gold X-Ran: hd2~$ (Eric M. Ludlam's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:06:28 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156587 Archived-At: "Eric M. Ludlam" wrote: >> There are various things that this affects; see M-x list-packages >> output. semantic, srecode, inversion, pulse, ede, etc. They all have >> different version numbers at present. > > These used to all go out separately and were later merged into once > CEDET package. Is there a reason to version-merge them? I'm not asking for any changes like that, I'm just asking for someone to who knows about CEDET versioning to check that all the version numbers the components have in Emacs make sense. Eg the first one I look at is semantic.el, which says: ;; Version: 2.0 [...] (defvar semantic-version "2.1beta" Ie, inconsistent in the same way that cedet.el is. I don't have any opinion on what the version numbers should be, I am saying that these two should be consistent, and asking what value to use. I have no idea what version of CEDET, semantic, etc are actually in Emacs.