From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? Date: 25 May 2002 18:53:38 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200205242114.g4OLE2T02822@aztec.santafe.edu> <87661d57dm.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <87ptzl3p19.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022367236 8051 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2002 22:53:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 22:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17BkQ8-00025k-00 for ; Sun, 26 May 2002 00:53:56 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Bkgi-00056L-00 for ; Sun, 26 May 2002 01:11:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BkQT-0004RD-00; Sat, 25 May 2002 18:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17BkPq-0004Hz-00; Sat, 25 May 2002 18:53:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17BkPq-00034n-00; Sat, 25 May 2002 18:53:38 -0400 Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Miles Bader's message of "25 May 2002 12:05:38 +0900" Original-Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4385 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4385 Miles Bader writes: Incidentally, it's a big pain to read uuencoded stuff. Why not just post the diffs themselves? ok. i guess uu approach is from old days (when mail readers were prone to mangle diffs). that's not an issue if the diff is to be read only (and not applied). thi