unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* copyright in .tex files
@ 2005-08-10 14:00 Thien-Thi Nguyen
  2005-08-10 14:11 ` David Kastrup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2005-08-10 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)


a common macro in etc/*.tex defines `year' like so:

  \def\year{2001}

could a TeXnician confirm that is ok to change this to:

  \def\year{2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005}

?  if no, why not, and what is the right way?

thi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: copyright in .tex files
  2005-08-10 14:00 copyright in .tex files Thien-Thi Nguyen
@ 2005-08-10 14:11 ` David Kastrup
  2005-08-13  1:25   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2005-08-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: emacs-devel

Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org> writes:

> a common macro in etc/*.tex defines `year' like so:
>
>   \def\year{2001}
>
> could a TeXnician confirm that is ok to change this to:
>
>   \def\year{2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005}
>
> ?  if no, why not, and what is the right way?

Well, since \year is an internal count register, the _normal_ use
would be

\year=2001

It would seem that the named files violate that convention, and use
\year as a user-defined text macro (you'd have to use \the\year to
refer to the counter, whereas with the macro definition, \year alone
constitutes the reference).

So if any external file would be relying on the _normal_ definition of
\year, it would break.

It would appear, however, that etc/*.tex are purely stand-alone plain
TeX documents.  For such documents, the basic rule is "the right way
is what happens to work".

Apparently, \year will only be referenced in the file itself.  If it
compiles, and looks ok at all places where \year gets used, it is "the
right way".  Personally, I'd prefer to use a different name for the
macro rather than the predefined "\year" in order to avoid people
getting confused, but that consideration has obviously not deterred
the previous authors.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: copyright in .tex files
  2005-08-10 14:11 ` David Kastrup
@ 2005-08-13  1:25   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2005-08-13  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: emacs-devel

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> [\year usage unconventional but probably ok]

thanks for the explanation.

this winter i will dig into TeX (a bit) and perhaps
do some light future-proofing of the .tex files.
until then, looks like \def\year{2002, 2003, ...}
is most straightforward.

thi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-13  1:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-10 14:00 copyright in .tex files Thien-Thi Nguyen
2005-08-10 14:11 ` David Kastrup
2005-08-13  1:25   ` Thien-Thi Nguyen

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).