From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NT Emacs make problem.. Date: 10 Jun 2002 06:39:51 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <9735-Wed05Jun2002210858+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200206070044.g570igm25650@aztec.santafe.edu> <200206081915.g58JFrE28855@aztec.santafe.edu> <200206101015.g5AAFAQ01507@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023707191 22898 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2002 11:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17HN0J-0005xD-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17HNN7-0005iS-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:30:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HMzt-0002Rf-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 07:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HMaW-0006IO-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 06:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17HMaV-0003gM-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 06:39:51 -0400 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:15:10 -0600 (MDT)" Original-Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4694 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4694 Richard Stallman writes: Why not put those preparations into the `bootstrap' target in Makefile? That target is meant for use on a CVS checkout, and these chmods do no harm there. Would you like to write the appropriate command and add it to Makefile.in? not really. i get particular on build methodology and am likely to whine about other things (unproductively) if i get involved in this way. perhaps D. Goel can supply the appropriate patch in addition to writing INSTALL-CVS. thi