From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149872317 367 80.91.229.2 (9 Jun 2006 16:58:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 09 18:58:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokJ9-000376-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:58:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokJ9-0004As-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FokIu-00046b-AB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FokIs-00041T-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokIs-00041H-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.135.220.15] (helo=mx2.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FokQw-0002mU-EF; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52BE1EBF0; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii X-Yow: Yow! I just went below the poverty line! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:49:41 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55796 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Please see whether the GCC versions are different (although I cannot > yet see how a different version could explain such large > differences). What is the GCC version on your SUSE 9.2? 9.2 has gcc 3.3.4, whereas 10.0 has 4.0.2. > Can people who know about SUSE think of any differences between these > two versions that could explain the difference in pure space usage? I could think of data alignment being an issue, but otherwise the behaviour of the generated code should be identical (modulo bugs). Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."