From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:33:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146324860 30252 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2006 15:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 29 17:34:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZrSb-0002it-Bb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:34:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZrSa-0001Yr-MG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZrSO-0001Ym-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZrSM-0001YW-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZrSM-0001YT-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.135.220.15] (helo=mx2.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FZrVj-0002Lv-An; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922071EBC0; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:33:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii X-Yow: Why am I in this ROOM in DOWNTOWN PHILADELPHIA? In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:13:18 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53595 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > . Minor differences in the defvar's and custom forms, like these: > > -(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2763)) > +(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2801)) > > -(custom-declare-variable 'backup-by-copying 'nil '(#$ . -3035) :ty= pe 'boolean :group 'backup) > +(custom-declare-variable 'backup-by-copying 'nil '(#$ . -3073) :ty= pe 'boolean :group 'backup) > > I think these differences are immaterial, but just so we don't miss > something of importance: could someone who knows more than myself > about the byte-compiled code please tell what are those numbers that > differ between the two systems? These are pointers to the doc string, offsets into the file (the sign is the user-variable-p flag). Since the comment at the start of the files differ in length the offsets will differ too. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."