From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:15:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20050406.104501.107253615.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112782626 4750 80.91.229.2 (6 Apr 2005 10:17:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 12:17:02 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ7an-0004e2-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:17:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ79r-0005JW-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ77s-0004v0-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:47:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ77s-0004sj-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.135.220.15] (helo=mx2.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DJ7ZS-0007Vm-Oa; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 06:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C595C4CED; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) X-Yow: OVER the undertow! UNDER the overpass! Around the FUTURE and BEYOND REPAIR!! In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:28:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35618 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35618 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Werner LEMBERG writes: > >> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs. >> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal >> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you >> would normally like to have for daily work. > > Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too. Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name should contain the word debug. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."