From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177531866 21515 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2007 20:11:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Henrik Enberg , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 22:10:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgnpD-00036p-SV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:10:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgnus-0000vF-Ap for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgnuo-0000um-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgnum-0000uO-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgnum-0000uL-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hgnp5-0002bh-PQ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712E2122D4; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:10:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Does someone from PEORIA have a SHORTER ATTENTION span than me? In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:05:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70129 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> * At the moment, it is slightly worse than current Rmail when it com= es >> to non-ascii support. One of the major points of moving to the mb= ox >> format is to be compatible with external tools, and that rules out >> storing mailboxes in emacs-mule form, which old Rmail does. I'm >> still not sure what the best approach here would be here. UTF-8? >> Raw text? > > The mailbox should not be decoded, most likely. > The decoding should only happen when displaying a message. FWIW, this is also what Gnus is doing. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."