From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:11:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <462E310C.20400@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177438312 15724 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 18:11:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 20:11:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgPUQ-0003Nc-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:11:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgPZx-0000l2-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgPZu-0000ji-IC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgPZs-0000gG-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgPZs-0000g8-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgPUK-0002Bb-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0D021662; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:11:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: RELAX!! ... This is gonna be a HEALING EXPERIENCE!! Besides, I work for DING DONGS! In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:05:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69964 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > With your patch, (eq "" "") =3D> t > > So: > > ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 0) (substring "ab" 0)) > nil > ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 1) (substring "ab" 1)) > nil > ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 2) (substring "ab" 2)) > t > > That doesn't seem a nice behaviour. I see nothing wrong with that. If you want to compare strings you have t= o use equal or string-equal anyway. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."