From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Repeating tag searches does no longer work. Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 13:45:14 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1091360772 7784 80.91.224.253 (1 Aug 2004 11:46:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 01 13:46:03 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BrEmx-0008Qk-00 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 13:46:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrEqI-0003j1-JJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrEqA-0003iw-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrEq9-0003ik-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrEq9-0003ih-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.135.220.2] (helo=Cantor.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BrEmG-0002K2-59; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A417799E578; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:45:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: David Kastrup X-Yow: I'm ANN LANDERS!! I can SHOPLIFT!! In-Reply-To: (David Kastrup's message of "01 Aug 2004 08:56:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26133 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26133 David Kastrup writes: > Uh, yes. It is C-u M-. that repeats M-. Sorry for the false alarm. > Would there be drawbacks if M-, also did it? * Changes in version 19. ** M-. (find-tag) no longer has any effect on what M-, will do subsequently. You can no longer use M-, to find the next similar tag; you must use M-. with a prefix argument, instead. The motive for this change is so that you can more reliably use M-, to resume a suspended `tags-search' or `tags-query-replace'. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."