From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CFLAGS change Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:01:18 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058256206 21244 80.91.224.249 (15 Jul 2003 08:03:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 15 10:03:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19cKmR-0005WK-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:03:23 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19cL05-0000QD-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:17:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cKnC-00038D-1n for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 04:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19cKmL-0002om-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 04:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19cKku-00023l-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 04:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193] helo=Cantor.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19cKkS-0001xT-37; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 04:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258E914602; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:01:19 +0200 (MEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Yow: Is there something I should be DOING with a GLAZED DONUT?? In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:58:33 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15618 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15618 Richard Stallman writes: |> What's wrong with "./configure CFLAGS=-g"? |> |> Does specifying CFLAGS in configure that way have a semipermanent |> effect? Yes. When config.status reruns configure it uses exactly the same command line. |> Just specifying CFLAGS was the first thing I did, but I believe I |> recall I found that did not turn off INLINE. Perhaps something in |> configure could check the value of CFLAGS and use that to control |> whether to inline. That should not matter since gcc does not do any inlining at -O0. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."