From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: diff-apply-hunk documentation doesn't match implementation Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:45:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173800765 26574 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 15:46:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 16:45:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HR9C5-0006Mb-GJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:45:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HR9Cr-0003AW-K2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:46:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HR9Co-0003AD-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HR9Cl-00039z-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HR9Ck-00039w-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:46:26 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HR9Bx-0002FT-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B439A12367; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:45:33 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Gibble, Gobble, we ACCEPT YOU --- In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:36:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67865 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > So, there was fundamentally only 1 file, right? > It just so happened that diff-mode found 2 different matching files (on= e for > the "old" and one for the "new"), but it was unintended? Yes, that's one way to look at it. In the real situation there were some differences between the orig tree and to working tree, but those were unrelated to the patch. > I'm not sure what you mean by "this behaviour". I guess the confusing > behavior is mostly the inconsistency between diff-goto-source and > diff-apply-hook, is that right? Right, and it became worse after I read the doc string. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."