From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode build: "comparison is always true" warnings Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87oddltv7f.fsf@everybody.org> <87hcjcoo2x.fsf@everybody.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195852995 17540 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2007 21:23:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 22:23:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ivfzc-0006Mb-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:23:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvfzO-0001yv-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvfzK-0001yg-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IvfzI-0001ww-LH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvfzI-0001wi-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IvfzH-0004yQ-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6853520AF5; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:22:57 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: .. here I am in 53 B.C. and all I want is a dill pickle!! In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri\, 23 Nov 2007 15\:02\:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84009 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>>> (The use of mktemp is not really bad here anyway.) >>> Why not? >> Because it is used securely. > > I assumed that's what you meant. The question is: why is it secure in > this case? Please tell me which part of the sources you have difficulties to understand, then I can explain it to you. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."