* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS
[not found] <E1PBkET-0004td-NR@eggs.gnu.org>
@ 2010-10-29 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris
2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-10-29 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:18:22 -0400
> From: emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org
>
> revno: 102145
> committer: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> branch nick: trunk
> timestamp: Fri 2010-10-29 00:04:09 -0700
> message:
> Sync docs of some X, W32, NS C functions.
>
> * src/nsfns.m (Fx-display-save-under, Fx-open-connection)
> (Fxw-color-defined-p, Fxw-display-color-p, Fx-show-tip):
> * src/w32fns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection):
> * src/xfns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection):
> Sync docs between X, W32, NS.
> modified:
> src/ChangeLog
> src/nsfns.m
> src/w32fns.c
> src/xfns.c
> -------------- next part --------------
> === modified file 'src/ChangeLog'
> --- a/src/ChangeLog 2010-10-29 03:29:29 +0000
> +++ b/src/ChangeLog 2010-10-29 07:04:09 +0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
> 2010-10-29 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
>
> + * nsfns.m (Fx-display-save-under, Fx-open-connection)
> + (Fxw-color-defined-p, Fxw-display-color-p, Fx-show-tip):
> + * w32fns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection):
> + * xfns.c (Fxw_color_defined_p, Fx_open_connection):
> + Sync docs between X, W32, NS.
> +
I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of
these functions, with most of their bodies in separate functions that
live in platform-specific files. Then the doc string would be in only
one place, which I think will deliver us from the need to go through
this pain in the future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS
2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii
@ 2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris
2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2010-10-29 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of
> these functions, with most of their bodies in separate functions that
> live in platform-specific files. Then the doc string would be in only
> one place, which I think will deliver us from the need to go through
> this pain in the future.
Absolutely something like that would be better. (The doc-strings will
still need to be unified, so the current changes are a small step in
the right direction.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Sync docs between X, W32, NS
2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2010-10-29 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have only one implementation of
I don't wonder. I know it to be the case (and have said so in this
list a few times already).
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-29 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1PBkET-0004td-NR@eggs.gnu.org>
2010-10-29 10:19 ` Sync docs between X, W32, NS Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-29 16:24 ` Glenn Morris
2010-10-29 16:29 ` Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).