From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: CHENG Gao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is it planned to remove xemacs compatibility code? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:26:26 +0800 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098809452 596 80.91.229.6 (26 Oct 2004 16:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 18:50:45 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMUWz-0006lm-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:50:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUeg-0004ke-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUdp-0004Ki-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUdo-0004K5-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUdn-0004Jm-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMUVb-0004My-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMU97-0004DT-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:26:05 +0200 Original-Received: from 218.2.143.161 ([218.2.143.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:26:04 +0200 Original-Received: from chenggao by 218.2.143.161 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:26:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.2.143.161 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RN/dhqgLJADrCS2rgKY9uvq1hXA= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28977 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28977 Around Emacs code, I find many Xemacs compatibility code as (cond ((featurep 'xemacs) blah ...) (if (featurep 'xemacs) blah ...) Personally I think these codes should be removed. And in etc/TODO, I can not find item for remove of these codes. So I just wonder if it's desired. I think if it's planned, dev team can post a message or add an item in TODO file. Thus every Emacs user can submit patch file. After all, this kind of fix is not hard for ordinary users. Wish my question is not too dumb. -- 德不孤，必有邻 -- 《论语-里仁》