From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: mail-utils Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:36:03 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096006177.432792.29828.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <1096014084.739640.30529.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <200410031040.i93Ae1YS000609@oak.pohoyda.family> <87d5zvwmq9.fsf_-_@oak.pohoyda.family> <20041006214742.GA5180@fencepost> <87mzywyeau.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> <20041008234741.GA17298@fencepost> <878yafj2tn.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097491710 17022 80.91.229.6 (11 Oct 2004 10:48:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 12:48:18 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGxiz-0001ho-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:48:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGxpt-0000iq-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGxel-000225-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGxei-000204-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGxei-0001zZ-7b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:43:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CGxXj-0000Cw-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:36:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGxXf-0008Ab-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:36:35 +0200 Original-Received: from c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se ([217.215.27.65]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:36:35 +0200 Original-Received: from jas by c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:36:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zk/0TDNQ/7/bUThyBo8EnI2R6vI= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28226 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58804 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28226 Alexander Pohoyda writes: > Wouldn't it be good to have these two things clearly separated? I support this. Although I don't know whether using mm is all that problematic. I don't think the user need to use mm just because rfc*.el uses it. Modularizing files from Gnus is generally a good thing. As an aside, Lars once said, on the topic of rfc*.el, that "RFCs wither and die, lisp is forever", arguing against rfc*.el as the name of lisp files. Instead, the RFC 2047 functionality could be moved into qp.el, RFC 2231 could be moved into (say) encoded-word.el, etc. One reason is that RFC numbers are obsoleted once in a while.