From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: questions about define-minor-mode Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:21:02 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4576E95FD8124CC1B0C77C7DECF45EE7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270783286 18305 80.91.229.12 (9 Apr 2010 03:21:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 03:21:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 09 05:21:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O04ma-0006q4-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:21:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O04mZ-0000Hm-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:21:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O04mU-0000Hh-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34243 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O04mS-0000HZ-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O04mR-0008Jt-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:21:16 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O04mR-0008Jl-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O04mP-0006nn-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([71.237.24.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:21:13 +0200 Original-Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:21:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) In-Reply-To: <4576E95FD8124CC1B0C77C7DECF45EE7@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123374 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > Why not always define a defcustom for a minor mode, and advertise to users the > use of Customize for minor modes? What am I missing? And why not always defvar a hook symbol for the minor mode? -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA