From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Belchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows-specific questions about Bazaar Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:55:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <834ooamrou.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdgql9zg.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5reko08.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259733339 28585 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2009 05:55:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:55:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 06:55:32 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFiBX-0006KH-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:55:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFiBX-00036Y-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:55:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFiBR-000363-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFiBN-00034j-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60328 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFiBM-00034a-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59291) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFiBM-0003sx-Br for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:55:20 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NFiBJ-0006HR-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:55:17 +0100 Original-Received: from 92-49-243-221.dynamic.peoplenet.ua ([92.49.243.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:55:17 +0100 Original-Received: from bialix by 92-49-243-221.dynamic.peoplenet.ua with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:55:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 92-49-243-221.dynamic.peoplenet.ua User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <83r5reko08.fsf@gnu.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118118 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii пишет: >> From: Alexander Belchenko >> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:15:49 +0200 >> >>> Sure, it works; I didn't want to imply it doesn't I think the default >>> SSH client (paramiko, whatever that is) uses pageant for >>> authentication, but plink is not used unless BZR_SSH is set. >> I'm not quite understand your last remark. > > There was a period missing there, after "doesn't". Does that help to > understand it? I was just telling Lennart how I think it works by > default: uses pageant for authentication, but does not use plink or > psftp for the actual access. > >> Using paramiko on Windows is safe choice. > > I was asking about relative merits. Are there any? Using bzr with plink has proved to have problems in some corner cases, because bzr launch plink as subprocess and therefore has very little control over it. Paramiko is python library with rich API, so bzr can have more fine-grained control over it.