From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is rst.el included in Emacs 23.1.1 or not? Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:35:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201004071425.42898.tassilo@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270643970 23829 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2010 12:39:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 07 14:39:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzUXV-0003N3-OW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:39:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzUXU-00030H-PO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzUUL-0001r6-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43093 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzUUJ-0001qE-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzUUI-000651-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213]:63780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzUUI-00064i-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so977698fxm.9 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:36:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=16TAxQscpwY3e2Vpb5HlMCZMlZCpL9fuziQpCMiKyRM=; b=NUoNr+75QaZYhN0tZmWJmyJ6ApBbXhX2C0X9TVYr7nmZRvx/l8nY0+ROr3ohe923++ O1TW5YaKbUQfP4gN2Bp/6vK6feKlAH3lJeZVdgd0HSaEnzCsSMZ+7GoaXNfwRtpIWzjn urvKakXU8s0bphPQWbdv+otAQ5G2LfEOwrNys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=udqV/f8YzY25d/gzK6xLxOMxvp+GqAt7GwJVGFI+B4kK4ElleW58pZLndognKNivv2 3FG8FXFRVelM854KpglhArl96tft6dE9yy06ek5gyMr8OxUN5M9ExAxlde9SE+QzhIYG zg9fLMdR3QdNqt2KNpa8qDjdodGnJgGkRnIE0= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:35:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201004071425.42898.tassilo@member.fsf.org> Original-Received: by 10.239.187.72 with SMTP id k8mr830498hbh.47.1270643764203; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:36:04 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123310 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote= : > On Wednesday 07 April 2010 13:47:55 Lennart Borgman wrote: > > Hi Lennart, > >> Martin Soto says in the bug report below that rst.el is not included >> in his Emacs 23.1.1 copy from Ubuntu Lucid Beta. His Emacs reports >> this: >> >> =C2=A0 GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0) of 2010= -03-29 on >> =C2=A0 rothera, modified by Debian >> >> My copy of the downloaded Emacs 23.1.1 official binaries for w32 has >> rst.el. > > The official emacs-23.1.tar.bz2 includes rst.el and on my gentoo box it > is installed (and the ebuild basically just unpacks the tarball, run > configure, make and make install). > > Maybe the ubuntu packagers stripped some files which can be installed > from other packages, docutils in that case? > > Concerning Martin's "I'm pretty sure that the newer rst.el installed > separately is loaded" issue: he should check that using > > =C2=A0M-x list-load-path-shadows > > to be sure. Thanks Tassilo. I will ask Martin about that.