From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug in change in button.el? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:03:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6rslaq65sp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <17966.33559.852546.313154@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17966.37044.847300.217748@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <2fabwxjqhw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878xchib7t.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177466774 2801 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2007 02:06:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 04:06:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgWtW-0002Pw-NC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:06:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgWz5-0002cE-UM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgWz2-0002a0-Jz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgWz2-0002ZZ-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgWz2-0002ZJ-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgWtS-00029O-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgWqq-0001UW-AP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:03:24 -0400 X-Spook: Sears Tower Vince Foster MP5K-SD CISU gamma MDA Clinton X-Ran: H>\e^*r="ulFDnGt^*`[2;RwZ=}Z> (Miles Bader's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:33:11 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70036 Archived-At: Miles Bader wrote: > I suppose a bug report to RH is in order... They know. It was in the release notes way back in RH8: On the console, the latarcyrheb-sun16 font is used for best Unicode coverage. Due to the use of this font, bold colors are not available. > [Is it a color display? On the linux console "bold" usually really > means "bright" not actually a different font.] Yes, it is colour. I wonder if there is any way for Emacs to tell that bold is not actually supported in this case? It's not important though.