From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: warn-maybe-out-of-memory Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83egxtax97.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2ddaw52.fsf@gnu.org> <53BF6B2F.5030701@yandex.ru> <837g3kbd9g.fsf@gnu.org> <53BFA3BB.6090709@yandex.ru> <8361j4b744.fsf@gnu.org> <53BFB1C3.9020202@yandex.ru> <5kpphafqd9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <53C22ED8.5050206@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405292464 18308 80.91.229.3 (13 Jul 2014 23:01:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 23:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 01:00:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlN-0007GM-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 01:00:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlN-0004q0-78 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlJ-0004pj-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlJ-0005Sz-0F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlI-0005Sr-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6SlG-0001eQ-Gp; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:50 -0400 X-Spook: ASIO MP5K-SD advisors LLNL Sears Tower SEAL Team 6 Mafia X-Ran: y`W0Z#}TeHf6s03V,(PpIAJ\()+{9fhYTWw2>TH#Y&>4'Ww*fm~fGrV!R?c'x.!0 X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <53C22ED8.5050206@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:01:44 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173017 Archived-At: Dmitry Antipov wrote: > In the example above, I asked for 10G having just 8G free. Then it seems just plain wrong for Emacs to warn about that. I have 6GB of memory on my machine, but the amount "free" according to your definition is very close to 0 most of the time. >> The performance of Emacs is pretty poor with large files - the default >> large-file-warning-threshold is 10MB! > This may be subject to change without notice :-). Well, if you manage to improve Emacs's performance in this regard by 3 orders of magnitude, that would be impressive...