On 5 May 2010 10:56, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> wrote:
> [......]

I take the point. I have included a patch that fix the bug in a more
general but still cleaner way. Please let me know if it works for you
in both ido and iswitchb too. Thanks.

> IMHO the virtual buffers feature is still a bit unfinished. For
> example, it doesn't support multiple "virtual buffers" for files with
> the same name on different directories. There was talk of using
> uniquify to fix that, but again, my feeling is that tying ido to
> uniquify is unwise; the virtual buffers implementation (on ido) should
> fix its own problems in a more generic way.

This is put on hold until FSF received my paper. As soon as that
happens John will push patches from his repo, one of which will also
enable C-k to kill virtual buffers.

> Just my 0,02€
>
>    Juanma

Leo