From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#5765: Strange things happens with C-v in read-file-name Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eij9r6hu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iq8l1mbc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hnqpk08.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <8739ye1d08.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272556188 4312 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2010 15:49:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5765@debbugs.gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , "Kim F. Storm" To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 17:49:45 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7Vzl-0002hf-B7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:49:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7Vzk-0006d3-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7Vvk-0004VJ-Ac for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51687 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7Vvi-0004Th-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7Vvh-0005bh-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:19503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7Vvh-0005bZ-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so3935409fga.12 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:45:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5GVVjYEY1HFYbLWYHT9srE3N/SyLMNwZfksFy6MmPXQ=; b=r1+F2VKAvxWMuotzstNXj0cUwvcSCspvN916zs+RqGXxOBml5HHOniBpSizUlSJ3Ac itR6L6dWB9hbMoOHXauRspWsFVIgOJ+4ZRt0/ngTmpVWtJWQgRvl0qi2J/q8ugwRxcIX iNRnqwP8wF2F4to54h9G1htXha8YKXjJIcOSA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uBhwjjqv0T1FuIiSyAMnZ+wW5YK+UrG3lIg9l7Aq1wRb55GJYKxB1qb4Tm4Xs9EYL+ /YTFuMMpS7TzbzBKI9n1cUwp5XXlYnrU75bHLfugadKriy0FLnXltCgCYqmWN90mNXbn 1+JhBLC59SbpxgQhBg6O+VG8ghWKBR2H9J63I= Original-Received: by 10.239.187.131 with SMTP id l3mr838500hbh.104.1272555932142; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:45:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8739ye1d08.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124323 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chong Yidong wrote= : > no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >>> Nothing happened to this so I am sending this again. Could this please >>> be fixed before the release? >>> >>> Kim, could you perhaps comment on this? Could the line >>> >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0(setq cua-inhibit-cua-keys t) >>> >>> be removed? >> >> IIRC, the reason for this was the following binding in ido file mode: >> >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 (define-key map "\C-v" 'ido-toggle-vc) >> >> If cua-mode is enabled, C-v is processed by cua (as paste), shadowing th= e >> above command. >> >> I guess nobody really uses that specific feature of ido. >> I used to use it a lot back when I wrote ido, but never uses it these da= ys. >> >> So the best thing to do would be to remove the above binding - then you >> can also remove the setting of cua-inhibit-cua-keys. > > Done. > > (In the trunk, not in the branch; this is not serious enough to make an > exception to the regressions-only policy). Thanks. But maybe it is serious enough for the release because CUA keys does not work in the minibuffer at all without this change. (And I doubt it can break anything.)