From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: CHENG Gao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is it intended to change hook names to follow coding conventions? Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:15:01 +0800 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101143712 23349 80.91.229.6 (22 Nov 2004 17:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 22 18:15:02 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CWHmH-0008QP-00 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:15:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CWHvL-0000EK-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CWHvA-0000E5-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CWHv9-0000DL-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CWHv9-0000DI-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CWHls-0005Ai-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:14:36 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CWHll-0007Jb-00 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:14:30 +0100 Original-Received: from 218.2.142.128 ([218.2.142.128]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:14:29 +0100 Original-Received: from chenggao by 218.2.142.128 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:14:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.2.142.128 X-Hashcash: 1:20:041122:gmane.emacs.devel::2RO0T+PqNQi/LSq9:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001vzt User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3c95Qf+wlF67T+vHbmW64ziBPII= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30256 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30256 Reading Coding Conventions, I understand that hook names with -hooks and -functions are obselete in favor of -hook and -function. I just wanna know if it's intended to change these names to following this convention for next release. If so, I can spend some time to make diffs. Otherwise I wont bother to waste time here. -- 这去者，不能见他的脸，背影模糊。